Author Archives: Christopher Doyle

Optimistic about technology policy

Communication In The Metaverse

There may be a plethora of forms of communication within the metaverse.

Can you fathom having real life conversations whilst having every Meta product developed so far at your disposal?

It would make for excellent collaboration, merging of ideas and the creation of future technology. Bringing people together through their avatars will build community, even though they may be miles apart.

Diagrams, progress reports and future projections all manipulatable within a virtual space.

However, as we already know about smart phone usage and the pessimistic view some may have of the time spent “on screen,” what about those who are vulnerable to too much “within metaverse” time?

How could we provide a solution to those who are liable to burnout or are “addicted” to new technologies and gadgetry?

It may be a case of discerning reality, or arranging real life meetings through RoundUp.

Now RoundUp is not a counselling application, but perhaps counsellors could have a real affect in the metaverse.

Positive technology psychology policies would need to be in place for those susceptible to any harm through technology use.

Techno-Optimism

What do you think the whole point of modern technology development is?

Where is it leading humanity in the future?

Are you optimistic or pessimistic about our current technological advancements?

This blog post outlines an argument for “Techno-Optimism,” the view that our modern technology is leading humanity to a better planet.

I first heard the term Techno-Optimism from Marc Andreessen’s “Techno-Optimism Manifesto,” an elegantly written case for the view of technology as a way to bring a fairer planet to all.

Humans are inherently optimistic. Optimism can be described as having a positive outlook on the future, pertaining to goals and purpose. The goals and purpose of technological advancements are also inherently positive. Humans have a will to grow, to become better every day. And so it is with our technology. Our technology is growing at an unprecedented pace and it is all in the name of growth and connection to one another on this planet.

The A.I that is all the rage these days serves to amass general artificial intelligence, where the machine is as intelligent as humans. At this point in the future, many of our chores, tasks and goals will be automated. This can only serve a positive purpose, freeing us from the chores and tasks that may seem menial to us.

So how will our planet and its inhabitants progress as general artificial intelligence becomes a reality?

We will have everything we need in abundance. We will have more time to explore our purposes. We will have more time to connect with each other. We will have more energy, in all its forms to raise the vibration of the planet. We will be at peace.

Must the creators of new technologies seek the blessing of public officials before they develop and deploy their innovations?

New innovations need support, talent and finances in order to have an impact on this planet. To regulate such innovations slows down global progress. Therefore, we need some new systems where the government and innovators can work fairly in tandem.

Such systems should allow for the rapid growth of the innovations in question, rather than being stifled by regular government check points and questioning.

These innovations are contributing to a fairer, more economically sound planet.

However, the most advanced innovations today such as artificial intelligence and robotics, must certainly be assessed for risk by the government in order to form policies that protect against these risks. Perhaps the new systems will allow safety whilst accelerating growth.

At a development level, regulation stifles innovation. At a larger scale, concerning market ready technologies, perhaps some intervention from governments is appropriate.

The whole point is that our current technologies are all developed in aid of a better planet, the most cited benefit being a superior economic landscape across the globe. Ideally, our planet and all its functions will be automated and nobody will lack anything. New roles will arise as our planet becomes self sufficient and people will have more time. With this time people will be able to get to know each other better, and the technology will aid in this endeavour also.

The Metaverse

It is a little known fact that social media and all its former content may be very important to some features of the metaverse. Your profile will and should be visible to all so that when you meet in these completely immersive virtual social environments you have credibility or an ID. Bad actors, therefore cannot even exist because they would have been “vetted” by social media.

Is social media one big test for bigger things such as the metaverse in online communication?

Some users are not savvy in online communication. Look at Sulers online disinhibition effect. Behind the screens anyone has the balls to say anything. However, in the metaverse all arrive online almost as if in person.

The policies for the metaverse are in their infancy in writing. There are many other factors concerned in comparison to social media policies. There are more actual dimensions and the metaverse is a true social space where your real face (hopefully) is your avatar, if that makes sense. Violations of policies could be detected in speech and physical behaviour. Then there are your senses. Sight, sound and touch are involved, perhaps even your remaining senses in the future. What begets a policy violation there?

Social norms will guide how people behave in person, I am sure this will transfer to the metaverse. I can see some form of metaverse “police” appearing in interactions where people cross each others boundaries, giving warnings and citing policies.

Human behaviour will be easier to measure in the metaverse. Users who receive many warnings from the hypothetical metaverse police avatar might receive some takeaways for their normal daily lives. Remember, people meeting remotely want to get work done.

I heard that Twitter is defunct. What?

So, not completely defunct but rebranded as “X.” I wonder what this means…

X. Ex-tech company? Excellent? X-files? Who knows? But a short messaging social media brand as X IS quite stylish. All the same, I have my reservations. Who knows what the future holds for “X”, but perhaps their policies might be tidy.

Has anyone ever witnessed a large social media company go through so many changes of brand and leadership since such companies existed? I think not but anyway…

Please bring Threads to Europe soon. I support Meta. I prefer collaboration over competition.

There are plenty of links between Europe and the States. EU regulations should loosen a tad.

Early News Guy

How Current Technology Will Allow People To Socialise Easier

There are many new technological advancements in development today that will allow people to meet in person. The top tech companies in the world for social media and mobile devices are forming partnerships to allow connectivity that has never been seen before.

In the past, these advancements have failed for the most part. This was due to patenting rights and partly due to the unavailability of such advanced technology.

The benefits of such connectivity between the worlds leading social media platforms and mobile devices are far reaching. People will be matched adequately for many different reasons and will find each other in person depending on their geographical proximity. This will allow for progress between those who have ideas, skills and finances as they come together in person.

The Best Possible Outcome for A.I

In the future, there will be a plethora of new positions in many industries.

Consider the 1800s. The industrial revolution had begun and for the first time in our planets history there was a means for people to exchange their time for money, food clothing or shelter. It was a far cry from bartering. As a result, we now have structures and inventions that still exist today.

Nextly, consider the 1900s. Communication became global and work that was done in the 1800s was improved for efficiency.

In 100 years our planets inhabitants had joined in creating a better place for all. Connections could be made more easily and work became fairer. There was more choice.

However, leaders in the 1800s and 1900s could not predict work positions of the future. Today, there are so many different roles that the current fears around A.I and joblessness in the future is equally difficult to predict, according to Adam Thierer. Around the year 2014 when IBM’s Watson was exclusively available to the specialists there, the term used was “cognitive computing.” Cognitive computing implies that humans work alongside machines. Of course, the development of A.I and algorithmic structures involves many people, companies and industries.

The current debate globally revolves around regulation of A.I. I support innovation to be “innocent until proven guilty,” and as an optimist I believe the fears are out of ignorance.

As with any computer there are inputs and outputs. The information gained from generative A.I may be overwhelming for the average user with a ChatGPT app. However, A.I can save people a lot of time, especially in the finance and banking industries. The technology has been in existence for quite a while now, it is its mainstream use that is causing a stir.

As previously mentioned, many people are involved in developing A.I further. The goal of everyone involved is to align algorithmic systems with the well-being of humankind.

gemma moore

AI, Robotics And Social Interaction

Has anybody ever encountered a real life robot with physical features just like a human being?

Some of us may have heard about these robot-humanoids from Japan in the 1980’s. The prerogative here was to bring the Japanese society together (society of human beings).

Would you even know if you met one of these humanoid robots? Current technology might suggest that it is difficult to discern these robots from real actual human beings.

But what are these robots’ main function on our planet? Some people reckon that their main function is to interact with lonely people, to the point of sexual relations.

Is this the robots’ only real function?

A lot of jobs these robots can accomplish require a human touch. As mentioned above, a brief encounter with a robot might be one where it is difficult to distinguish a real human being from a robot.

But what about the human touch, such as with energy transfer? This might be a sure way to decide which jobs are appropriate for the robots and which jobs are not.

Wouldn’t it be useful if these robots aided in bringing together people who really need to meet? Instead of their former function, perhaps such A.I powered humanoid robots could act as a modern chaperone.

One serious issue which could be addressed by the above solution is the coming together of certain public figures, who by and large experience difficulties meeting people close to them romantically without interference from lay people and the media.

It’s difficult to determine the overall global sexual climate after the pandemic since different countries and regions have been affected in various ways. However, the pandemic has led to a significant shift in the way people approach their sexual health and well-being.

Due to social distancing protocols and lockdowns, many individuals have had to limit or completely abstain from physical intimacy, which has caused frustration, anxiety, and other negative impacts on mental health. On the other hand, there has been a rise in the use of technology for safer sexual practices, including virtual dating and remote sexual encounters.

I really hope a solution formulates rapidly for those still slightly shy after the isolation they may have experienced during the previous pandemic.